2009/6/3 Adrian Stott <[email protected]>: > Nick <[email protected]> wrote: > >>Adrian Stott wrote: >>> I doubt that. I think that in most cases if Person A decides that the >>> higher nav charges have discouraged him from continuing to own his >>> junky boat, I suspect Persons B, who is likely to be similar to Person >>> A, will find it unattractive to buy the boat and pay the same charges. >>> More likely that the boat will be scrapped.
>>Well that's me put in my place. I'm finding it hard to justify spending >>the increasingly ludicrous amounts BW is taking for license. But my >>boats junky and should be scrapped, so that's OK. >> >>You arrogant twit. > Person A is an example, who happens to own a junky boat. His > existence does not imply that all people deciding to spend their > leisure money elsewhere have junky boats. What is that statement meant to prove? And what about people in the position of Person A? Or don't you care? -- Bob
