So you'd close a navigable waterway so you didn't have saplings in your pound? Even by your standards Adrian, that seems a little self interested. So what would you do to cover the shortfall? Make us all pay more for our moorings? Double our licence fee (except for wide beam boats moored on the Lee and Stort?)
Steve Sent using BlackBerry® from Orange -----Original Message----- From: Adrian Stott <[email protected]> Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2009 17:29:20 To: <[email protected]> Subject: [canals-list] Re: Which waterway(s) to close first? Steve Haywood <[email protected]> wrote: >Perhaps it might lead them to review non-necessary expenditure like >the veg pledge. I think the VP work is not only highly necessary, but doing an annual water-to-wall cut is the most economical way to deal with towpath vegetation. Although having spent large sums removing the veg backlog on the pound I moor on, BW is now letting it grow up again. The saplings are already over 2 m tall. Adrian Adrian Stott 07956-299966 ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/canals-list/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/canals-list/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[email protected] mailto:[email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
