Nigel Stanley wrote:
> 2009/12/1 bloovee <[email protected]>:
>> It's a very good showing - often it's only the mover of the adjournment 
>> debate and the minister responding....
> 
> Steve is right. Adjournment debates are typically for one MP to raise
> a particular hobbyhorse directly with the minister. Sometimes they
> will rustle up supporters if the issue goes wider than their own
> constituency. Sometimes this will be done an an all-party basis.

Mr Irranca-Davies commented on what a good turn-out it was:
"I congratulate my hon. Friend the Member for Stourbridge and the 
numerous hon. Friends who have turned out to support her and the 
waterways. This is typical of debates on waterways, which are always 
well attended. These are truly the constant friends of the waterways."

I thought he was being sarcastic, but it seems from what Steve and Nigel 
say that this was not the case.
http://is.gd/5ayfl
-- 
Martin Clark

Pennine Waterways Website    http://www.penninewaterways.co.uk

Reply via email to