On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 21:55:51 +0000 (GMT), S NEILL <[email protected]> wrote:
>>Our mate Steve tended not to suffer from the above problem twice :-) >>Bru >Probably wouldn't work for Pamela Anderson... Is she likely to be looking in at Steve? bjg
On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 21:55:51 +0000 (GMT), S NEILL <[email protected]> wrote:
>>Our mate Steve tended not to suffer from the above problem twice :-) >>Bru >Probably wouldn't work for Pamela Anderson... Is she likely to be looking in at Steve? bjg