We still can't fully get rid of panda until it's no longer supported. As long as that's the case, we'll need to support panda *and* calxeda since they don't use the same kernel. There's also still an ArmadaXP board lingering around (yes, Marvell Armada), which is still supported on at least Precise. So until that's EOL in 2017, we'll need it around to do kernel SRUs.
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 3:24 AM, Para Siva <[email protected]> wrote: > On 23/10/13 01:56, Evan Dandrea wrote: > >> For example, why do we still have a ton of pandas when we now have the >> Calxeda? Are they wired up to anything? Can we bin them? >> > > We are still using one panda (qa-panda-2) for quantl kernel SRU in m-o. > Calxeda has not been setup for that yet. May be we could do that this cycle. > > Thanks > > > > -- > Mailing list: > https://launchpad.net/~**canonical-ci-engineering<https://launchpad.net/~canonical-ci-engineering> > Post to : > canonical-ci-engineering@**lists.launchpad.net<[email protected]> > Unsubscribe : > https://launchpad.net/~**canonical-ci-engineering<https://launchpad.net/~canonical-ci-engineering> > More help : > https://help.launchpad.net/**ListHelp<https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp> >
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~canonical-ci-engineering Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~canonical-ci-engineering More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
