There are panda and armada nodes attached to mayura which were used for upstream merger at one time. These should be re-allocated.
Francis On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Adam Conrad <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 09:12:49AM -0500, Paul Larson wrote: >> We still can't fully get rid of panda until it's no longer supported. As >> long as that's the case, we'll need to support panda *and* calxeda since >> they don't use the same kernel. There's also still an ArmadaXP board >> lingering around (yes, Marvell Armada), which is still supported on at >> least Precise. So until that's EOL in 2017, we'll need it around to do >> kernel SRUs. > > And please don't keep just one of each of these. The odds of a dev board > dying between now and 2017 are pretty good, so keep a few spares on hand. > > ... Adam > > -- > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~canonical-ci-engineering > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~canonical-ci-engineering > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp -- Francis Ginther Canonical - Ubuntu Engineering - Quality Engineer -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~canonical-ci-engineering Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~canonical-ci-engineering More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
