On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 1:08 PM, Thomi Richards <[email protected] > wrote:
> Hi everyone, > > > > Thanks for the replies. I'd like to summarise my understanding: > > > - Test authors *should* add test classes that describe the test > environment they require. However, adt-run ignores these, and there's no > infrastructure piece that reads and understands these classes, so this is > purely for future-proofing. I don't think we've defined these - I suggest > just using whatever makes sense, and we can clean these up later. > > I agree on just defining what is currently needed, and I think Martin's suggestion of 'touch' should cover the cases I'm aware of. > > - > - Test suites that fail will not block package promotion, unless those > failures are regressions (i.e.- they have passed in the past). > - Test authors *must* make tests skip if they're run in an > incompatible environment (hint: if you're writing autopilot tests, the > autopilot.platform module might help here). > > > Did I miss anything? > > > Steve - does this answer your question? > > -- > Thomi Richards > [email protected] > -- Francis Ginther Canonical - Ubuntu Engineering - Continuous Integration Team
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~canonical-ci-engineering Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~canonical-ci-engineering More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
