Hi guys, could you switch the thumbnailer over to build with xenial too please? We've dealt with the license-check issue already (which wasn't the builder's fault), so it should build and test OK.
Cheers, Michi. On 13 Nov 2015, at 12:10 , Michi Henning <[email protected]> wrote: > It looks like CI is now building scopes-api with Xenial, thanks! > > However, I just stumbled into a new problem. All the builds on Xenial fail > because license-check isn't working. > > See the build log here for an example: > http://s-jenkins.ubuntu-ci:8080/job/unity-scopes-api-devel-xenial-amd64-ci/ > > What is interesting that, in a silo, things work fine with Xenial, which > makes me suspect that this might be a configuration issue with the builder. > > Could you have a look please? > > Thanks, > > Michi. > > > On 12 Nov 2015, at 15:28 , Michi Henning <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> On 12 Nov 2015, at 13:35 , Francis Ginther <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Michi, >>> >>> Apologies for not sending out a notification. This was actually completed >>> some time ago. The branches lp:thumbnailer, lp:unity-scopes-api/devel and >>> lp:unity-scopes-api are built on vivid and xenial in CI (and no wily). >>> >>> But it looks like we missed lp:unity-scopes-api/devel. Is this the branch >>> that causing the issues or is there a different problem that needs to be >>> investigated? >> >> You mean thumbnailer/devel? At any rate, we'd like to have both thumbnailer >> and unity-scopes-api built with vivid+overlay and xenian for both devel and >> trunk. >> >> Thanks for your help! >> >> Cheers, >> >> Michi. >
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~canonical-ci-engineering Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~canonical-ci-engineering More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
