I would also love to see this happen for cap 2.0. Jamis- is there
anything moving towards 2.0 that you would like to see that I can
help work on? I know your a busy guy.
Cheers-
-Ezra
On Jan 17, 2007, at 11:42 PM, Mike Bailey wrote:
I think this is great news!
It will make life easier for people writing plugin gems which in turn
will lead to more and varied recipe gems surfacing.
Another system built around the 'everything is a plugin' idea is
Nagios
network monitoring. Is just makes things easier to grok when the core
is simplified and decoupled from the peripheral bits.
- Mike
On 18/01/2007, at 3:11 PM, Jamis Buck wrote:
Neil,
My vision for Capistrano 2.0 is to follow the suggestions a few
people have offered and decouple "Capistrano-the-part-that-
executes- remote-processes" from "Capistrano-does-rails-
deployment". The "core" capistrano bit would be installable
standalone, with no defaults. The rails-specific bits would then
depend on capistrano-core.
- Jamis
On Jan 17, 2007, at 3:20 AM, NeilW wrote:
How does '-x' work with this lot?
It would be quite useful if '-x' skipped preloading of any task
library
- including standard. I might be (and often am!) doing something
with
capistrano that doesn't involve Rails deployment at all.
>
>
>
-- Ezra Zygmuntowicz
-- Lead Rails Evangelist
-- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Engine Yard, Serious Rails Hosting
-- (866) 518-YARD (9273)
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/capistrano
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
