> > Is it not a standard set-up to maintain his own repository server anymore?
I can't speak for everyone, but I don't consider a server in the office to be a server, unless it has backups, real DNS, and is accessible from everywhere. Also SVN is so hopelessly antiquated that I personally haven't used it in more than 5 years, so I can't even say what the paid hosting options are these days. I know that a "copy" strategy is considered *missing*, I've been as clear as I can about why it's gone (to make a long story short, again, it was s foot gun, and often deployed secret files out of working copies, and with he myriad of options (scp, sftp, rsync, cp, etc, etc) it didn't work out of the box, and there was no "correct' way to copy a working copy to a production server. As documented on my blog, http://lee.hambley.name/2013/06/11/using-capistrano-v3-with-chef.html you can create a tarball with rake, and upload it to your server that way. It's not perfect, I know, but it's the closest I have ever documented to how you might do that. Lee Hambley -- http://lee.hambley.name/ +49 (0) 170 298 5667 On 26 February 2014 00:31, Benjamin B <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> The copy strategy was removed due to nobody in the entire project's >> history ever having been satisfied with the default options we chose. (I >> might be exaggerating, but the feature never seemed to work out of the box >> for anyone, rsync, exclude patterns, sftp vs. scp, etc, etc, etc) - the >> easiest way is just to provide the versioning framework and give people the >> tools to do whatever works for them. >> >> > Hi Lee, > > I believe a lot of people was extremely satisfied, but you know how it > goes: we never hear from satisfied people :) > The feature worked well out of the box for me for example. I have a local > SVN server in my office, and could deploy flawlessly through the copy > strategy. > Is it not a standard set-up to maintain his own repository server anymore? > > At least if capistrano does not maintain the copy strategy anymore, can > you route us to an alternative solution? > > Thanks for the great work! > > Regards, > Benjamin > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Capistrano" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web, visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/capistrano/4420c778-4142-46b1-9a98-4d0719cbfbd0%40googlegroups.com > . > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Capistrano" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/capistrano/CAN_%2BVLVqnVN7xyhGeH75AJfFchAnsvHd90_TEz7OtNYpoj46nw%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
