On Wednesday, February 26, 2014 3:14:53 PM UTC+8, Lee Hambley wrote: > > Is it not a standard set-up to maintain his own repository server anymore? > > > I can't speak for everyone, but I don't consider a server in the office to > be a server, unless it has backups, real DNS, and is accessible from > everywhere. Also SVN is so hopelessly antiquated that I personally haven't > used it in more than 5 years, so I can't even say what the paid hosting > options are these days. >
Ok I understand that you made your choices concerning Capistrano. I ended-up creating my own copy strategy. It was quite simple, and the re-coding of Capistrano v3 is great simple and flexible. Congratulations! A little think I just want to clarify, because this is a public accessible discussion and a non-experimented person could mistakenly take your consideration for the truth: - The definition of a 'server' is not related to his connectivity to internet, or to the kind of service it serve. - SVN is very actual, and no better not worse and other products -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Capistrano" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/capistrano/ba9c995b-5825-4c99-b0fc-ccfad0f819f6%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
