On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 11:16 AM, Sameera Jayasoma <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Samisa Abeysinghe <[email protected]>wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 10:54 AM, Sameera Jayasoma <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 10:35 AM, Samisa Abeysinghe <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 10:31 AM, Milinda Pathirage >>>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>>> >>>>> I have to do some fixes reported in the pack we gave for QA last week. >>>>> I'll do it today. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Guys, this is not about fixing issues. This is about feature completion. >>>> (Well, this is a patch release, so no feature completion as such, rather >>>> all >>>> those main work items) >>>> >>>> From what I hear, it is only the memory stuff from Sameera that is >>>> pending, in terms of major work items, that will have potential regression >>>> threat. Isn't it? >>>> >>> >>> Our bridge servlet implementation is derived from a sample >>> implementation from Equinox. I profile this original BS implementation and >>> found that there are memory leaks in it, when you restart. I suspect that >>> some of the memory leaks in Carbon occurs due to the issues in the original >>> impl. Therefore we may need to fix bridge servlet implementation. I am not >>> sure whether we need to change Equinox impl as well. I need to dig into this >>> issue some more. >>> >> >> Sure, but you already have done some fixes right? Can those go in? >> > > sure, I will commit the changes today itself. > And as we discussed offline, lets include other fixes, specially those specific to Equiknox into 2.0.3 Samisa...
_______________________________________________ Carbon-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/carbon-dev
