> > In that case isn't it the user's responsibility to provide a complete, > fully qualified JNDI object name? We can of course make it easier by > providing some recommendations in the UI depending on the selected JMS > provider. For instance when Qpid is stated as the broker, we can provide a > text field partially filled with "connectionfactory." to specify the > connection factory name. >
Hiranya, I think this is what Manjula is concerned about. He had an offline chat with me yesterday regarding this. The easiest thing would be to let the user provide fully-qualified JNDI names which is not that user-friendly IMO. So rather than providing a partially filled text box, we an let user inter JNDI names and we dorequired appending/prefixing internally. Danushka > > If we stick to the current approach, please change the url name parameter > to something more meaningful like "JNDI Object Name Prefix". >
_______________________________________________ Carbon-dev mailing list [email protected] https://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/carbon-dev
