Hi danushaka, Thanks for pointing out some mismatch with current sqs implementation with sqs api. I will go through the api again and will do the required changes before monday.
Thank you. On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Manjula Rathnayake <[email protected]>wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Since the ultimate objective is to get an existing SQS client to work with >> our MessageBox implementation, we need to verify that before the beta. We >> need to use SQS standard error codes in our SOAP faults. Also I notice that >> we need to do little changes to make the behaviour identical. (e.g. updating >> visibility timeout) >> > > Yes, I will add the error codes and change the visibility timeout value > with remaining value + new timeout value. As currently it is updating only > with new timeout value. > > Thank you. > > >> >> Danushka >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Carbon-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/carbon-dev >> >> > > > -- > Manjula Rathnayaka > Software Engineer > WSO2, Inc. > Mobile:+94 77 743 1987 <+94777431987> > -- Manjula Rathnayaka Software Engineer WSO2, Inc. Mobile:+94 77 743 1987
_______________________________________________ Carbon-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/carbon-dev
