Great!. Thanks, Danushka
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Manjula Rathnayake <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi danushaka, > > Thanks for pointing out some mismatch with current sqs implementation with > sqs api. I will go through the api again and will do the required changes > before monday. > > Thank you. > > > On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Manjula Rathnayake <[email protected]>wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <[email protected] >> > wrote: >> >>> Since the ultimate objective is to get an existing SQS client to work >>> with our MessageBox implementation, we need to verify that before the beta. >>> We need to use SQS standard error codes in our SOAP faults. Also I notice >>> that we need to do little changes to make the behaviour identical. (e.g. >>> updating visibility timeout) >>> >> >> Yes, I will add the error codes and change the visibility timeout value >> with remaining value + new timeout value. As currently it is updating only >> with new timeout value. >> >> Thank you. >> >> >>> >>> Danushka >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Carbon-dev mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/carbon-dev >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Manjula Rathnayaka >> Software Engineer >> WSO2, Inc. >> Mobile:+94 77 743 1987 <+94777431987> >> > > > > -- > Manjula Rathnayaka > Software Engineer > WSO2, Inc. > Mobile:+94 77 743 1987 > > _______________________________________________ > Carbon-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/carbon-dev > >
_______________________________________________ Carbon-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/carbon-dev
