> yes, that could have been done so, I just put SQS since SEND_MESSAGE is not >> just "send" but "SendMessage", that is SQS specific. >> I understand that those names should be common. I will change them. >> > > What you have to have is the action name which is defined in the spec. if > the spec says "SendMessage" use as it is. No need to have any extra or > reduce things. >
But Amila if I have the control over it I still go for shorten, common variants. In this case we know its SendMessage when we process it. Internal representation has nothing do with what the spec says. Danushka
_______________________________________________ Carbon-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/carbon-dev
