On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura <[email protected]>wrote:
> > yes, that could have been done so, I just put SQS since SEND_MESSAGE is not >>> just "send" but "SendMessage", that is SQS specific. >>> I understand that those names should be common. I will change them. >>> >> >> What you have to have is the action name which is defined in the spec. if >> the spec says "SendMessage" use as it is. No need to have any extra or >> reduce things. >> > > But Amila if I have the control over it I still go for shorten, common > variants. In this case we know its SendMessage when we process it. Internal > representation has nothing do with what the spec says. > But that make unnecessary mapping of spec representation vs what we use internally. Which may cause confusion if some else try to read this code latter. thanks, Amila. > > Danushka > > _______________________________________________ > Carbon-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/carbon-dev > >
_______________________________________________ Carbon-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/carbon-dev
