On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Rajika Kumarasiri <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 7:42 AM, Afkham Azeez <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 6:51 AM, Rajika Kumarasiri <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 3:31 PM, Afkham Azeez <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> The UI is distorted. Who adds this param? Anyway, I personally feel that >>>> adding a param named hasUIExtensions is ugly from a services PoV. This is >>>> purely a Carbon Mgt Console thing, and adding a "hasUIExtension" param, and >>>> then setting serviceType = hasUIExtension is pretty hacky and ugly. >>> >>> >>> Azzez, >>> >>> The logic serviceType = hasUIExtensions was added to re-use the same >>> logic not to mean that serviceType == hasUIExtensions. >>> >> >> Yeah, it was a hack! and a parameter called hasUIExtension in a service >> also sounds wrong. On the other hand serviceType is a special qualifier for >> a service, and is not a UI aspect, so having that param in the service is >> OK. >> >> > I fixed this properly making the service-mgt UI CSG aware once you > installed the CSG component. When you install the CSG component a separate > UI fragment will appear for CSG configuration. I have also attached a screen > shot. > > Thanks Azeez for pointing me the correct way to fix the problem. > Excellent! Looks good. > > Rajika > -- *Afkham Azeez* Senior Software Architect & Senior Manager; WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com, * * *Member; Apache Software Foundation; **http://www.apache.org/*<http://www.apache.org/> * email: **[email protected]* <[email protected]>* cell: +94 77 3320919 blog: **http://blog.afkham.org* <http://blog.afkham.org>* twitter: **http://twitter.com/afkham_azeez*<http://twitter.com/afkham_azeez> * linked-in: **http://lk.linkedin.com/in/afkhamazeez* * * *Lean . Enterprise . Middleware*
_______________________________________________ Carbon-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/carbon-dev
