On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Tharindu Mathew <[email protected]> wrote:
> Suho, > > This does not measure the ability to handle load. Basically, what we did > for load testing earlier was send around 2M messages, with concurrency as > high increasing from 100 - 1500 clients. > How many back end servers and client programs used for that? > > Your test is a measure of being able to consistently handle a stream of > messages, which IMO, maybe important but is less interesting when handling > load. This test has measured the one client one server. yes it can be improved to one client to many servers and many clients to many servers. But this test gives the through put this can handle one client to server. For one client scenario whether you add messages with one thread or many threads does not effect the performance if there are enough messages to send. thanks, Amila. > To truly test the ability to handle loads we need to do a distributed load > test with an extremely high number of clients and see the breaking point. > Earlier, we could not find such a point with a single machine. > > > On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Suhothayan Sriskandarajah > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Amila Suriarachchi <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> through put should not depend on the number of messages send. You need >>> to send sufficient number of messages after server warmed up. >>> >>> Can you please first send around 2M messages and take the numbers for >>> next 10M messages. >>> >>> And also try to test with number of back end servers. >>> >>> >> Yes, I'll work on this >> >> Thanks >> Suho >> >> >>> thanks, >>> Amila. >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 9:25 PM, Suhothayan Sriskandarajah <[email protected] >>> > wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> According to the decisions made at the architecture mailing list on the >>>> subject "Serializing generic Siddhi events using Thrift", >>>> I did some improvements to the code base of Agent component and did a >>>> performance testing. >>>> >>>> Here I did the tests by sending total of 1 million and 10 million >>>> events using for loop, >>>> in both cases I have sent events using 1,2,5,10 & 20 Clients. >>>> >>>> The results are as follows >>>> >>>> * 1M 10M* >>>> *1* 245118.1 269328.8 >>>> *2* 517509.1 739699.7 >>>> *5* 585823.1 923986.7 >>>> *10* 345582.3 418865.7 >>>> *20* 285008.6 368881.2 >>>> >>>> I have also attached the performance graph >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> Suho >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> *S. Suhothayan >>>> * >>>> Software Engineer, >>>> Data Technologies Team, >>>> *WSO2, Inc. **http://wso2.com >>>> <http://wso2.com/>* >>>> *lean.enterprise.middleware.* >>>> >>>> *email: **[email protected]* <[email protected]>* cell: (+94) 779 756 757 >>>> blog: **http://suhothayan.blogspot.com/*<http://suhothayan.blogspot.com/> >>>> * >>>> twitter: **http://twitter.com/suhothayan*<http://twitter.com/suhothayan> >>>> * >>>> linked-in: **http://lk.linkedin.com/in/suhothayan* >>>> * >>>> * >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> *Amila Suriarachchi* >>> >>> Software Architect >>> WSO2 Inc. ; http://wso2.com >>> lean . enterprise . middleware >>> >>> phone : +94 71 3082805 >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> *S. Suhothayan >> * >> Software Engineer, >> Data Technologies Team, >> *WSO2, Inc. **http://wso2.com >> <http://wso2.com/>* >> *lean.enterprise.middleware.* >> >> *email: **[email protected]* <[email protected]>* cell: (+94) 779 756 757 >> blog: **http://suhothayan.blogspot.com/*<http://suhothayan.blogspot.com/> >> * >> twitter: **http://twitter.com/suhothayan* <http://twitter.com/suhothayan> >> * >> linked-in: **http://lk.linkedin.com/in/suhothayan* >> * >> * >> >> > > > -- > Regards, > > Tharindu > > blog: http://mackiemathew.com/ > M: +94777759908 > > -- *Amila Suriarachchi* Software Architect WSO2 Inc. ; http://wso2.com lean . enterprise . middleware phone : +94 71 3082805
_______________________________________________ Carbon-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/carbon-dev
