On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Amila Suriarachchi <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Tharindu Mathew <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Suho, >> >> This does not measure the ability to handle load. Basically, what we did >> for load testing earlier was send around 2M messages, with concurrency as >> high increasing from 100 - 1500 clients. >> > > How many back end servers and client programs used for that? > > >> >> Your test is a measure of being able to consistently handle a stream of >> messages, which IMO, maybe important but is less interesting when handling >> load. > > > This test has measured the one client one server. yes it can be improved > to one client to many servers and many clients to many servers. > > This test also covers sending messages from many clients (2,5,10 & 20) to one server. Yes it could be improved to many clients to many server. If there are any specific requirements please suggest me a scenario, then I can do the testing and present the findings. Thanks Suho But this test gives the through put this can handle one client to server. > For one client scenario whether you add messages with one thread or many > threads does not effect the performance if there are enough messages to > send. > > thanks, > Amila. > > >> To truly test the ability to handle loads we need to do a distributed >> load test with an extremely high number of clients and see the breaking >> point. Earlier, we could not find such a point with a single machine. >> >> >> On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Suhothayan Sriskandarajah <[email protected] >> > wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Amila Suriarachchi <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> through put should not depend on the number of messages send. You need >>>> to send sufficient number of messages after server warmed up. >>>> >>>> Can you please first send around 2M messages and take the numbers for >>>> next 10M messages. >>>> >>>> And also try to test with number of back end servers. >>>> >>>> >>> Yes, I'll work on this >>> >>> Thanks >>> Suho >>> >>> >>>> thanks, >>>> Amila. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 9:25 PM, Suhothayan Sriskandarajah < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> According to the decisions made at the architecture mailing list on >>>>> the subject "Serializing generic Siddhi events using Thrift", >>>>> I did some improvements to the code base of Agent component and did a >>>>> performance testing. >>>>> >>>>> Here I did the tests by sending total of 1 million and 10 million >>>>> events using for loop, >>>>> in both cases I have sent events using 1,2,5,10 & 20 Clients. >>>>> >>>>> The results are as follows >>>>> >>>>> * 1M 10M* >>>>> *1* 245118.1 269328.8 >>>>> *2* 517509.1 739699.7 >>>>> *5* 585823.1 923986.7 >>>>> *10* 345582.3 418865.7 >>>>> *20* 285008.6 368881.2 >>>>> >>>>> I have also attached the performance graph >>>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> Suho >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> *S. Suhothayan >>>>> * >>>>> Software Engineer, >>>>> Data Technologies Team, >>>>> *WSO2, Inc. **http://wso2.com >>>>> <http://wso2.com/>* >>>>> *lean.enterprise.middleware.* >>>>> >>>>> *email: **[email protected]* <[email protected]>* cell: (+94) 779 756 757 >>>>> blog: **http://suhothayan.blogspot.com/*<http://suhothayan.blogspot.com/> >>>>> * >>>>> twitter: **http://twitter.com/suhothayan*<http://twitter.com/suhothayan> >>>>> * >>>>> linked-in: **http://lk.linkedin.com/in/suhothayan* >>>>> * >>>>> * >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> *Amila Suriarachchi* >>>> >>>> Software Architect >>>> WSO2 Inc. ; http://wso2.com >>>> lean . enterprise . middleware >>>> >>>> phone : +94 71 3082805 >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> *S. Suhothayan >>> * >>> Software Engineer, >>> Data Technologies Team, >>> *WSO2, Inc. **http://wso2.com >>> <http://wso2.com/>* >>> *lean.enterprise.middleware.* >>> >>> *email: **[email protected]* <[email protected]>* cell: (+94) 779 756 757 >>> blog: **http://suhothayan.blogspot.com/*<http://suhothayan.blogspot.com/> >>> * >>> twitter: **http://twitter.com/suhothayan*<http://twitter.com/suhothayan> >>> * >>> linked-in: **http://lk.linkedin.com/in/suhothayan* >>> * >>> * >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Regards, >> >> Tharindu >> >> blog: http://mackiemathew.com/ >> M: +94777759908 >> >> > > > -- > *Amila Suriarachchi* > > Software Architect > WSO2 Inc. ; http://wso2.com > lean . enterprise . middleware > > phone : +94 71 3082805 > > -- *S. Suhothayan * Software Engineer, Data Technologies Team, *WSO2, Inc. **http://wso2.com <http://wso2.com/>* *lean.enterprise.middleware.* *email: **[email protected]* <[email protected]>* cell: (+94) 779 756 757 blog: **http://suhothayan.blogspot.com/* <http://suhothayan.blogspot.com/>* twitter: **http://twitter.com/suhothayan* <http://twitter.com/suhothayan>* linked-in: **http://lk.linkedin.com/in/suhothayan* * *
_______________________________________________ Carbon-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/carbon-dev
