Hi, At Mon, 05 May 2008 20:57:13 -0400, Seiji Zenitani wrote: > > > Hi, > > I prefers mew over wanderlust, > because the author keeps on developing it, > and because you can easily contact him > at their mailing list: > <http://www.mew.org/mailman/listinfo/mew-int>.
Yes, its author did great work. I expect Mew replace WL but for instance WL interface is better and more complete. > On the other hand, wanderlust seems to be dead or sleeping. > A bug-fix version never shows up for the last three years, > and you can hardly reach the primary author. Yes. I agree. It's awful. The documentation is really bad too. I use a really stable CVS version (2007-12) and the mailing list are still active. So I don't see it as a dead project. (perhaps it should be upgraded in the next Emacs Carbon. In any case (and to conclude with this thread), Emacs22 is good for mail/news and with org/planner/howm it's even better than most of the standard MUA (Mail.app/Outlook/Eudora..). -- Martial > Seiji > > On 2008/05/05, at 11:57, Rexaurum wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I have been using Thunderbird for my email, but would like to > > try one of the emacs mail apps (in the spirit of stying in Emacs > > as much as possible). I have 3 IMAP servers to check, which > > each have various folders. I have checked Mew, Wanderlust and > > GNUS and all seem like a pain to configure, etc. I guess, I would > > like both a recommendation and maybe a sample .emacs section > > of how to set it up. > > > > Thanks, > > Frank > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Carbon Emacs User Group http://groups.google.com/group/carbon-emacs?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
