Hello Elpidio Latorilla, am Freitag, 20. Februar 2004 um 16:44 schrieben Sie:
EL> On Thursday 19 February 2004 21:57, Mark Painter wrote: EL> Still the problem remains: how can the system know that the "emergency" status EL> of the access request is legitimate "emergency" case. Some necessary things before. 1. Patient is master of his data. He have to allow in front that if there is an emergency. Data are allowed to show to others. This must be flexible programmed because in some states (possibly) there are different rules in that fact. 2. Which data can be seen by an emergency doc/team? There you need a problems list. this have to be made by the doc and the patient before such a emergency case happened. The data have to be anomised in the net... access. if something happened with the available data the server is hacked ... they have data, but not the answer who is that patient. to bring the data of a patient with the data of his record together, it needs an identification. This can be made by the patient himself. he can make it, by an emergency card. on this card (paper) there is the info how to access the data. eg. location, url of the server with data of this specific patient. 3. if the card is stolen or lost -> it is in the responsibility of the patient. there is only access to emergency data. not more. if you like to get more infos. different authorisation is necessary. from one point you need different authorisation passwords to come to the next point. there are thousands of possibilities if you go that way. 4. think extreme. use owl and semantics than you can use also a peer to peer network. Maybe i have some patient data are at my pc. --- its a case no more. i can't identify someone. ok i can steal the identity card of someone. the patient have to allow it if he share this risk. U can use it as a most powerful system. from every point the patient have to decide what happened with the data. EL> Maybe there are already running solutions somewhere. Canada and Israel. Function worldwide. They forgot the P2P net. If you do it in that way at least there is no central point. if there is some concentration of data. different interests like to have access to it. maybe governments, pharma industries etc. if you have a p2p net. there is no change to get a data concentration... EL> EL> Or maybe the system just "believes" it is really an emergency and logs the EL> event and releases the data. Read my mail before. There i told about such a system -- Mit freundlichen Gr�ssen Wilfried Goedert mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click _______________________________________________ Care2002-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/care2002-developers
