Hi Mellanie,

This segmentation was salvageable. Before I left yesterday, I emailed you off-list a list of voxels I'd toggled off along the calcarine sulcus and hippocampal fissure. There is a remaining handle, but I can't see it. The caret handle-finder shows a couple of small handles, but they're not visible on the inflated surface. You can re-run automatic error correction, which might fix the remaining handle, or just not worry about it; I doubt it will cause trouble during flattening or registration.

But here are some tips I wanted to share on-list for patching very narrow, fused sulci. In cases like this, I use toggle voxels, because the channel between the sulcus banks is usually only a voxel wide, so even a small mask is too big. For the calcarine sulcus and hippocampal fissure, I prefer the sagittal view, but some people prefer coronal. Before switching to toggle voxels mode, zoom/pan the surface so you can get the best view of the fused area. Then, press the toggle voxels button on the patching menu. The right mouse button toggles voxels off, left on. In the case of the calcarine fuse, sagittal slices 19-31 were affected, so start at 19 or 31 and work forward or back, slice-by-slice, carving out a channel in the segmentation. You have to toggle between vol1, vol2, and vol1+2 often during this process, to see where the sulcus actually is. I keep one hand on the arrow keys, the other on the mouse, so I can navigate quickly, toggling off voxels in stair-step fashion: right-click, arrow right, right-click, arrow up, right-click, etc. When one slice is done, increment (keystroke q when the cursor is in the slice window) or decrement (keystroke w) the slice and carve out the channel on that slice. Continue the entire extent of the fuse, until all slices are patched. Don't forget to save your changes incrementally (I do so every time I get a decreased handle count), so you can abandon a second or subsequent patch, without losing previous patches.

When you move to the next handle, press the button to resume normal mode, so you can navigate the slice window to the other problem area, and zoom/pan to make that region most visible. While in toggle voxels mode, you can't zoom/pan, so you have to turn it off until you're ready to start patching again. If you forget to do this, and find you've toggled off/on voxels you didn't intend to patch, then revert to the last saved volume as needed.

If several sulci are fused and/or the number of affected slices is large, you're often better off re-segmenting. Occasionally, adjusting the white matter peak upwards helps (but can sometimes cause the temporal lobe to fade out of the segmentation), but more often, bias correction preprocessing is needed to make the occipital lobe less bright relative to the rest of the volume. This wasn't the case with your volume.

Donna

On 09/14/2004 03:43 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hi Donna,

I uploaded the segmentation:

jan21_2003.R.full.segment_vent_corr.patch2_corr.patch2_corr.patch4.mnc

Thanks,

Mellanie

Quoting Donna Hanlon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

Hi Mellanie,

Since intensities in the occipital lobe tend to be higher (especially with volumes that have not been pre-processed with bias correction software such as FSL's fast, MNI's nu_correct, or AFNI's 3dUniformize), it's not unusual for sulci to fuse over in that region. Handles often result, but not always (particularly if the whole lobe is nearly solid white).

If you upload your segmentation, *sMRI.mnc and *sMRI.params, I'll see if it's salvageable.

Donna

http://pulvinar.wustl.edu/cgi-bin/upload.cgi

On 09/14/2004 12:47 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hi Donna,

I only have 3 errors remaining in my segmented volume. When I import the inflated surface into caret, it reports zero crossovers. However, the occipital lobe appears to be fused. I have tried fixing the handles in
caret
and using the objects list in surefit, but neither approach fixed the segmentation. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Thank you,

Mellanie
_______________________________________________
caret-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://pulvinar.wustl.edu/mailman/listinfo/caret-users



_______________________________________________
caret-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://pulvinar.wustl.edu/mailman/listinfo/caret-users



_______________________________________________
caret-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://pulvinar.wustl.edu/mailman/listinfo/caret-users



Reply via email to