Hi Joost, Define "considerable amount." Does 92 count? If so, then yes, but this hasn't been published. (It's part of an ADHD vs control manuscript that hasn't yet been submitted.) And we hadn't really planned to cover normal variability as a part of that paper.
David did publish some figures on this in his PALS paper: Van Essen, D.C. (2005) A population-average, landmark- and surface-based (PALS) atlas of human cerebral cortex. Neuroimage 28: 635-662. http://brainvis.wustl.edu/resources/-Pals.wcover.pdf see figure 6 But the number of subjects was either 12 or 24. Qualitatively, the variability maps look similar once n>=12. They just get smoother the larger n gets. Donna PS Nice talk at OHBM On 07/05/2010 06:53 AM, j janssen wrote: > Hi, > > i searched publications measuring sulcal depth but could not find a > good answer: has sulcal depth been mapped (vertex-wise) in a > considerable amount of healthy subjects to see how it variates over > the cortex (akin to e.g. cortical thickness which varies over the > cortex in healthy subjects, i.e. thicker inferior temporal and thinner > post central)? maybe you guys at wustl mapped and normalized a bunch > of healthy subjects to see how it varies over the cortex? > > thanks! > -joost > _______________________________________________ > caret-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://brainvis.wustl.edu/mailman/listinfo/caret-users > _______________________________________________ caret-users mailing list [email protected] http://brainvis.wustl.edu/mailman/listinfo/caret-users
