Two questions, if you'd be kind enough: 1) GUI issue
I've been using Caret for a while now. There is one niggle. I'm using ubuntu 10.04 64 bit. As you mentioned, the older version of caret that ships with this linux distribution has a couple of problems rendering files, and crashes sometimes. So, I use the latest version from the site. This works great *but* - much of the text falls off the edge of the buttons and menus. So, I have to guess what the buttons say on them. 95% this is ok, but not always. I've tried changing my QT config; this does have an effect on caret but, it does not solve the issue whatever I try. QT is 4.4.1 according to caret, and that's what I have installed (and I use NVIDIA GL drivers/libraries). I even tried just a full install of KDE (since that's a QT based thing) but it made no difference. The funny thing is it seems fine at work, also on ubunutu 10.04. Same hardware. same software. So I've installed some package at home that's causing this issue. I just can't think what it is. Although the ubuntu caret is buggy, it doesn't have these issues. I should locate it's config file and also look at what it's linking to when it runs. 2) getting stats of intersection of a paint/border and a metric Let us say I take a fiducial (or other representation) of F99 and I paint it only with LVE00 regions and borders. these borders and paints are very clearly defined. There were two big papers LVE00; a tracer and a regional dilineation. They go together. Caret macaque standard scenes & tutorial contains much on both. The nice thing is that the injection sites and results are presented as metrics on the surface. So, Is there any way I can 1) get the surface area of each LVE00 region (individually). also get the vertex set for that region. 2) given an injection (i.e. a metric) find out how much of the surface area of a painted region is painted also by the metric, and what intensity the metric has at each painted vertex? i.e.: in each region, about how much tracer came out? I know the answer from the publications of course, but I'd like to use caret as a resource. The info is spatially detailed, (even though lacking laminar info). We want that. Sorry if it's a trivial question. I really use caret mainly for visual exploration. I should learn it properly. Colin
_______________________________________________ caret-users mailing list [email protected] http://brainvis.wustl.edu/mailman/listinfo/caret-users
