The F99 full head volume is also part of these two datasets in SumsDB: http://sumsdb.wustl.edu/sums/archivelist.do?archive_id=684661&archive_name=MACAQUE.LEFT_HEM.04-01-29.tar.gz
http://sumsdb.wustl.edu/sums/archivelist.do?archive_id=684673&archive_name=MACAQUE.RIGHT_HEM.04-01-29.tar.gz Cheers, Jochen On 10/1/2012 9:09 AM, Donna Dierker wrote: > David might have more squirreled away on his machine somewhere, but I > couldn't find this in sumsdb or my archives. > > I'm sure some labs around here -- very likely the Snyder Lab -- have > used FSL's Brain Extraction Tool (BET) on the F99 atlas for various > purposes, but I'm not aware that they released anything like that for > public consumption. I do know from experience that the fractional > intensity threshold and gradient matter. Possibly loop through > several permutations and judge which combo you like best. > > There is a fullHead minc volume here: > > http://brainmap.wustl.edu/pub/donna/SAM/F99UA1.tar.gz login pub > password download > > Bit it's 256x256x180 -- not 240. I don't think it's the most > upstream volume we have, but it's the most upstream one I could > find. > > > On Sep 29, 2012, at 1:35 AM, Colin Reveley <cm...@sussex.ac.uk> > wrote: > >> Two enquiries, one more important than the other. Less important >> first: >> >> 1) Is there a brain extracted version of the F99 scan anywhere (a >> reference version)? >> >> I did do it myself, in fact took quite some time over it as I >> remember, but maybe there is a reference version that's better. >> >> I want to use it for some non-linear registration research. you >> need to register things that are definitely equivalent. And >> extracting monkey perfectly isn't that easy. >> >> 2) More important thing: >> >> One thing I'll be doing is registering F99 to a T1 of the animal in >> the attached image. That animal was, I'm told, in the same place at >> the same time as F99. >> >> For that, I wonder if there is a copy of the entire F99 scan? >> >> That would have huge value to me. >> >> I may be quite wrong, but it's very possible the original scan was >> 256x256x240 voxels and looked a lot like the attached picture. >> There's no doubt F99 was acquired in a similar scanner because he's >> sitting up. I don't think there are that many scanners like that. >> And I basically reckon it was the same coil and same or similar >> sequence, but I could be totally off. >> >> F99 is a really good scan in terms of artefact, in addition to >> being an atlas reference (as is this animal, but a different kind >> of atlas), so if you did have the entire thing that would be really >> great. We're in the atlas business for a bit. Sort of. F99 would be >> a really nice scan to have, for a bunch of reasons. It's unlikely >> we'd ever want to do more than experiment with it but obviously >> we'd ask if we did anything worth knowing about. >> >> I guess even if the scan was like that originally it's now long >> gone, but if not....that would be lovely. >> >> many thanks, >> >> Colin R >> >> >> >> >> <wemeetagain.png>_______________________________________________ >> caret-users mailing list caret-users@brainvis.wustl.edu >> http://brainvis.wustl.edu/mailman/listinfo/caret-users > > > _______________________________________________ caret-users mailing > list caret-users@brainvis.wustl.edu > http://brainvis.wustl.edu/mailman/listinfo/caret-users > -- ------------------------- Jochen Ditterich, Ph.D. Associate Professor Center for Neuroscience University of California 1544 Newton Court Davis, CA 95618 USA office: +1 (530) 754-5084 lab: +1 (530) 754-6987 fax: +1 (530) 757-8827 _______________________________________________ caret-users mailing list caret-users@brainvis.wustl.edu http://brainvis.wustl.edu/mailman/listinfo/caret-users
