Sorry that should be 565 cm2. On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:25 PM, Tristan Chaplin <tristan.chap...@gmail.com > wrote:
> Hi, > > I have been looking at the surface area of the PALS atlas and am a bit > confused as it seems smaller than I expected. The spec file > > PALS_B12.RIGHT.STANDARD-SCENES.73730.spec > > downloaded from > > > http://sumsdb.wustl.edu:8081/sums/archivelist.do?archive_id=6570866&archive_name=PALS_B12.RIGHT.STANDARD-SCENES.73730.spec > ) > > seems to have a fiducial surface area of 565 mm2 (including non-cortical > medial wall) but the Van Essen 2005 Neuroimage paper says the average > surface area of the individuals is 965 cm2. > > Am I doing something wrong, or is there is something about atlas building > that causes this? > > Thanks, > Tristan > > > > >
_______________________________________________ caret-users mailing list caret-users@brainvis.wustl.edu http://brainvis.wustl.edu/mailman/listinfo/caret-users
