I think your +1 is a ceremonial +1 ;-)
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 4:19 PM, Patrick Berry <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 12:08 PM, Scott Battaglia < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> I closed out a few remaining issues (one with the repo change and one that >> affects configuration. I made the auditing's principal resolver have a >> constructor which is consistent with our policy of having required >> properties set via constructor and optional ones set via setter <-- this >> should become more fun once we start using autowiring more). >> >> I also think I reduced the parent pom's dependencies about as low as they >> can go (turns out we use servlet-api in a number of places!) >> >> Any remaining items we should capture for 3.4 or should we cut the >> release? >> >> > I have RC3-SNAPSHOT running through the overlay with support-ldap and > haven't run into any issues. So, I think I've complained enough for this > release. Many thanks to Scott and Marvin. > > +1 for a release. Wait, what are the guidelines for voting again? > > Pat > > -- > You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: > [email protected] > > To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see > http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev > > -- You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: [email protected] To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev
