On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 12:46 PM, Marvin Addison <[email protected]>wrote:

> I'd argue Slf4jLoggingAuditTrailManager that's included with Inspektr
> would be entirely suitable for production use with the addition of a
> lock around all the logger.info statements.  Why not just fix/improve
> that one and have it included with the library?  (I guess it's a
> little more work to shepherd the changes to inspektr, but you get good
> karma, right?)
>
> M
>
>

Looks like a potential fix is already being tested in the library.

http://github.com/dima767/inspektr/issues#issue/3

-- 
You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: 
[email protected]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev

Reply via email to