> So close this one, and open another then? Seems to me we should simply track a fix on the same issue. This is pretty SOP in my experience: a problem is discovered with a fix to an issue so it's reopened until the problem is resolved. Just assign to me and I'll provide a patch via pull. I believe it will be straightforward to allow the sort of configuration needed to log the performance stats to log4j logger, with all of its configuration flexibility. That is to say it would be consistent with a point release.
M -- You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: [email protected] To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev
