Yeah, the JSR-310 will not land into standard JDK any time soon, so I see nothing wrong with depending on the Joda lib. at a time being.
BTW, I've done some wonderful stuff with Joda Duration API in the past at Rutgers implementing some pretty sophisticated temporal-based use cases, and love it! Cheers, Dmitriy. Sent from my iPhone On Mar 14, 2012, at 13:14, Jen Bourey <jennifer.bou...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes - my understanding is that the JodaTime library formed a lot of the basis > for that proposal. Is the JSR-310 API completed and available, though? I > thought it wasn't going to be part of Java until Java 8 or so. > > - Jen > > > On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 10:09 AM, Marvin S. Addison > <marvin.addi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Maybe adopting JodaTime would give CAS a good way to model durations? > We've been getting a huge amount of value out of using this library > in uPortal. > > It's worth clarifying that JSR-310 was inspired, if not based, largely on > JodaTime. While I'd be happy using the Period class, which models the > concept of duration Jen mentioned, from either library, it really looks like > the future of time in Java is JSR-310. > > M > > -- > You are currently subscribed to cas-dev@lists.jasig.org as: > jennifer.bou...@gmail.com > To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see > http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev > > > > -- > Jen Bourey > -- > You are currently subscribed to cas-dev@lists.jasig.org as: > dmitriy.kopyle...@gmail.com > To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see > http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev -- You are currently subscribed to cas-dev@lists.jasig.org as: arch...@mail-archive.com To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev
