On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 10:00 PM, Scott Battaglia <scott.battag...@gmail.com> wrote: > As I mentioned in the pull request (and especially since I advocated that > constructor :-D), I like the constructor method. However, I don't feel > there's enough compelling change to (a) remove existing constructors and (b) > change all of the default configuration for a 3.5 release.
Then you haven't done enough CAS deployments! > > That just seems like making a change for the sake of making a change, not > for the benefit of existing users. Not at all. Improving the experience of configuring a CAS deployment is a modest but important contribution. Best, Bill -- You are currently subscribed to cas-dev@lists.jasig.org as: arch...@mail-archive.com To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev
