Scott: Could JA-SIG ask for complete ownership of all code at this point? (remove any authorship) Or will CAS always carry a mixed bag of code owners and licensors?
It's a very grey area for me and you would think that any open source group would want a codebase that was singularly licensed. David On 11/25/08, Scott Battaglia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 10:34 AM, Phillip Rhodes < > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Scott Battaglia wrote: >> >>> Developers & Future Contributors, >>> >>> JASIG is currently investigating licenses for use in future projects. >>> One of the licenses being seriously considered is the Apache2 license. >>> >> >> >> +1 for Apache2 License. >> >> In addition, JASIG is looking at individual contributor license >>> agreements similar to the ones Apache uses. If anyone has any serious >>> objections or concerns, please let me know, >>> >> >> >> >> Not a bad idea, to protect the project. Just don't make it too >> bureaucratic and heavyweight a process to submit the ICL. > > > Hoping to make it as painless as possible since I'll need to submit one too > ;-) > > -Scott > > > > _______________________________________________ > cas-dev mailing list > cas-dev@tp.its.yale.edu > http://tp.its.yale.edu/mailman/listinfo/cas-dev > >
_______________________________________________ cas-dev mailing list cas-dev@tp.its.yale.edu http://tp.its.yale.edu/mailman/listinfo/cas-dev
