On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 12:43 PM, David Whitehurst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Scott: > > Could JA-SIG ask for complete ownership of all code at this point? (remove > any authorship) Or will CAS always carry a mixed bag of code owners and > licensors? > > It's a very grey area for me and you would think that any open source group > would want a codebase that was singularly licensed. > Our contributed code is all under one license currently. We do include software with compatible licenses. -Scott > > David > > > On 11/25/08, Scott Battaglia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 10:34 AM, Phillip Rhodes < >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> Scott Battaglia wrote: >>> >>>> Developers & Future Contributors, >>>> >>>> JASIG is currently investigating licenses for use in future projects. >>>> One of the licenses being seriously considered is the Apache2 license. >>>> >>> >>> >>> +1 for Apache2 License. >>> >>> In addition, JASIG is looking at individual contributor license >>>> agreements similar to the ones Apache uses. If anyone has any serious >>>> objections or concerns, please let me know, >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Not a bad idea, to protect the project. Just don't make it too >>> bureaucratic and heavyweight a process to submit the ICL. >> >> >> Hoping to make it as painless as possible since I'll need to submit one >> too ;-) >> >> -Scott >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> cas-dev mailing list >> cas-dev@tp.its.yale.edu >> http://tp.its.yale.edu/mailman/listinfo/cas-dev >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > cas-dev mailing list > cas-dev@tp.its.yale.edu > http://tp.its.yale.edu/mailman/listinfo/cas-dev > >
_______________________________________________ cas-dev mailing list cas-dev@tp.its.yale.edu http://tp.its.yale.edu/mailman/listinfo/cas-dev
