On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Marvin Addison <[email protected]>wrote:
> > If you know any good documentation writers willing to accept user abuse > and > > no pay, be sure to send them my way :-) > > I like the occasional writing and editing task; feel free to call on > me when needed. More than editors, though, I think the Wiki could > _really_ benefit from annual review by the Steering Committee. I'm not really sure we want the Steering Committee being in charge of this. I think a number of trusted volunteers and interested parties would be a better way to go, as well as at least the development team reviewing it. I think we'd only want to bring it to the Steering Committee if there were major quality control, lapses, or issues (which hopefully there are none) or we need them to locate resources. That said, I'm on the steering committee, so I may be biased ;-) > I'm > sure a number of folks could be convinced to write and edit once an > administrative body has reviewed content and determined areas for > improvement. I would argue the content review process is _much_ > harder/time consuming than actually making changes. > > M > > -- > You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: > [email protected] > To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see > http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user > -- You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: [email protected] To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user
