> I'm not really sure we want the Steering Committee being in charge of this.
Clearly I disagree. Documentation, like design, benefits from a small, focused team of individuals in charge. It seems entirely feasible to me that the Steering Committee could conduct an annual review of the wiki, post a "todo" list of changes needed, and request volunteers to actually make the edits. Whether or not volunteers take up the content change tasks, the review would produce tangible documentation for areas of improvement. > we'd only want to bring it to the Steering Committee if there were > major quality control, lapses, or issues The wiki suffers from some organization problems and incomplete and conflicting content. It's a matter of opinion whether the details of those problems constitute a major quality control problem. Given a feasible process for correcting those problems, we should doubtless correct them. My proposal for annual review by the Steering Committee is one potential solution. It puts the decision making process in the hands of a small number of qualified people, and that is a good thing. M -- You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: [email protected] To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user
