If you're using the in-memory storage, I don't recommend commenting out the
cleaner (you'll eventually run out of memory, though it could take a
while).  From the CAS perspective, there's no need to persist those jobs
either in disk or database.  I don't know if you have a local requirement
for that.

Cheers,
Scott


On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 12:37 PM, Kimberly Ennis <[email protected]>wrote:

>  Fair enough.  I double checked with the other person who was working on
> this on our production night (and who has more legacy app knowledge and more
> WebLogic knowledge than I do), and we do not have to persist to a database,
> however when we turned the database persistence off and started using disk
> instead (not in-memory, which we haven’t tried), we still got a failure.
> We also cannot recreate the failure in our development environment, which
> makes this extra-difficult to deal with.  At the moment, we’ve commented out
> the ticket registry cleaner part of ticketRegistry.xml.  While we are in
> production, this is an alpha release.
>
>
>
> *From:* Scott Battaglia [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* Monday, August 24, 2009 12:28 PM
>
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [cas-user] Quartz Persistence Error
>
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Kimberly Ennis <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> <snip />
>
> I've done some reading up on this and it seems that
> MethodInvokingJobDetailFactoryBean is not serializable and therefore
> cannot be used when Quartz is using a persisted store.  What doesn't
> make sense to me about this is that I feel like somebody must have come
> across this by now using CAS if this were the case (and therefore would
> have a workaround).  This is why we attempted switching to the
> JpaTicketRegistry to fix the problem, but it did not fix it.
>
>
> I doubt most people try and persist the Quartz job.  Its a relatively
> non-critical job if you're using In-Memory storage (because if your CAS
> server goes down then you've lost everything in memory anyway ;-))
>
> Cheers,
> Scott
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marvin Addison [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 11:30 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [cas-user] Quartz Persistence Error
>
> > method failed; nested exception is org.quartz.JobPersistenceException:
> > Couldn't store job:
> >
> org.springframework.scheduling.quartz.MethodInvokingJobDetailFactoryBean
> > [See nested exception: java.io.NotSerializableException:
> >
> org.springframework.scheduling.quartz.MethodInvokingJobDetailFactoryBean
> ]
>
> This reads like you're using the feature of Quartz where jobs are
> persisted to durable storage, e.g. RDBMS.  Is that correct?  Can you
> share any (redacted) Spring context XML files that you've modified for
> your deployment?
>
> Thanks,
> M
>
> --
> You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as:
>
> [email protected]
>
> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see
> http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user
>
> --
> You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as:
> [email protected]
> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see
> http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user
>
>
>
> --
>
> You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: 
> [email protected]
>
> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
> http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user
>
> --
> You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: 
> [email protected]
>
> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
> http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user
>
>

-- 
You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: 
[email protected]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user

Reply via email to