What is the problem with using the RESTful api to authN the user? 
 
You are never going to get SSO between web and thick clients. However,
you are just exchanging the browser data-entry application for a .NET
one to receive the credentials from the user. The pipe to the CAS server
is still the same, i.e. https secured, but from .NET app to CAS instead
of firefox/IE/Opera to CAS.
 
When the TGT comes back to the client, instead of going into the browser
cookie "vault" it is going into the custom client memory/persistent
store. This is more "obscure" than the browser cookie store, with as
much security as you choose to implement in your fat client.
 
Once you have the TGT in the .NET/java/etc client you can then grab ST's
using the TGT, in the same way as a browser does automagically by
presenting the TGT back to the CAS server. 
 
I agree with you as soon as you start sending the sso creds over the
network, but if we are just talking a different client application
replacing the browser on the user's workstation, I don't see the
problem. Please explain.
 
Thanks
 
Dale


________________________________

From: Scott Battaglia [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Tuesday, 16 March 2010 5:48 a.m.
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [cas-user] Does CAS offer SSO between web applications AND
a .NET fat client deployed with click once ?


The RESTful API is NOT designed for that type of behavior, nor is it
supposed to be used for that.  The goal of the RESTful API is to allow
for service-to-service non-human interaction without handing passwords
over to other services (one could use certificates to do a similar
thing). 

At Rutgers, our APIs (we actually have SOAP and not REST at the moment)
are configured such that you can't even send the username/password for a
user via that programmable API.

Cheers,
Scott



On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 12:45 PM, William G. Thompson, Jr.
<[email protected]> wrote:


        On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 12:14 PM, Scott M. Holodak
        <[email protected]> wrote:
        >> Sure you could.  In the local install (start menu) launch,
the app
        >> could just request the user's credentials and  authN directly
against
        >> CAS.
        >
        > The only problem with authenticating in the client app is that
the
        > client app can't [easily] initiate an SSO session and pass
proxy tickets
        > back to web browsers.
        
        
        True, but I was assuming that in the local launch, SSO was out
of the
        question.  The .NET Client could just use the CAS Server REST
API to
        authN the user and not worry about Tickets at all.
        
        http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/CASUM/RESTful+API
        
        Bill


-- 
You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: 
[email protected]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user

Reply via email to