Though one wonders then how many people use WARN :-)
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Marvin Addison <[email protected]>wrote: > > I too would be surprised if folks didn't believe this is how it works > already. I don't expect most adopters give this much thought. > > I'm in that camp. I hadn't considered it and would have thought it > would work with default ticket timeouts. This is doubly concerning > for me personally because I did a lot of work at one time to support > the warn flow for non-interactive X.509 auth back when the default > timeout was 30s. I must admit I didn't regression test when the > default was reduced, and I'm quite certain that we're breaking in many > cases if not the common case. > > M > > -- > You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: > [email protected] > To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see > http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user > -- You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: [email protected] To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user
