If the behavior is fixed, I don't see why we should arbitrarily turn
something off that's been active since 2.0 (or earlier) unless we've got
something better.


On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 6:00 PM, William G. Thompson, Jr.
<[email protected]>wrote:

> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 5:44 PM, Steve Swinsburg
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Turning it off by default won't fix the underlying issue if people turn
> it
> > on though.
>
> Sure, still needs to be fixed.  I'd say fix the behavior in 3.4.12 and
> make it default to off in 3.5.
>
> Best,
> Bill
>
> >
> > I wondered if there was some way to combine the ST timeout process with
> > checking the CASPRIVACY cookie that a user already gets when they tick
> that
> > checkbox and working this into the validation flow so the ST doesn't
> > timeout?
> >
> > But it sounds like changing the order of the ST generation might be the
> best
> > option.
> >
> > cheers,
> > Steve
> >
> >
> >
> > On 21/12/2011, at 8:32 AM, Scott Battaglia wrote:
> >
> > Before we add or drop it, I'd be curious from a UX standpoint, whether
> the
> > flow can be improved upon.  As mentioned before, we made some changes in
> the
> > CAS4 UI for it that appeared to be an improvement, but hadn't gone
> through a
> > formal UX review.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Marvin Addison <
> [email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> > It makes a lot of sense to me to consider turning this feature off by
> >> > default for CAS 3.5, especially if that just means commenting out the
> >> > mark up in the default UI.
> >>
> >> Whenever this feature comes up I feel like the only one who likes it.
> >> I think there's a valid use case if you have a non-interactive
> >> authentication and you want to provide some user feedback, possibly
> >> with a "don't bother me again" option.
> >>
> >> > Unless there's some groundswell of support for keeping it...
> >>
> >> I'd be open to drafting a proposal to drop it by default if not
> >> altogether and see who complains.
> >>
> >> M
> >>
> >> --
> >> You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as:
> >> [email protected]
> >> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see
> >> http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user
> >
> >
> > --
> > You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as:
> > [email protected]
> >
> > To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see
> > http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user
> >
> >
> > --
> > You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as:
> > [email protected]
> > To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see
> > http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user
>
> --
> You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as:
> [email protected]
> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see
> http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user
>
>

-- 
You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: 
[email protected]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user

Reply via email to