Yep, that was it, though I've got a question about this.
For the benefit of anyone else googling this...
In CAS 3.4.8 (and previous) we had these two hidden fields:
<input type="hidden" name="lt" value="${flowExecutionKey}" />
<input type="hidden" name="_eventId" value="submit" />
In CAS 3.4.9 (and later) the "default" theme has these three hidden fields:
<input type="hidden" name="lt" value="${loginTicket}" />
<input type="hidden" name="execution" value="${flowExecutionKey}" />
<input type="hidden" name="_eventId" value="submit" />
What I'm seeing in the rendered login page, though, is this:
<input type="hidden" name="lt" value="" />
<input type="hidden" name="execution" value="e3s1" />
<input type="hidden" name="_eventId" value="submit" />
So the ${loginTicket} variable doesn't seem to be filled. Is that broken?
Login works now, so from a functional standpoint I'm set, but I'd like to fix
that if it's incorrect. Can you point me to where that is set so I can make
sure I'm not overriding it someplace in my local overlay code?
Thanks much,
Tim
From: Scott Battaglia
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Reply-To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>"
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 19:40:49 -0500
To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>"
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: [cas-user] LDAP authentication changes from 3.4.8 to 3.4.9 (or,
preferably, 3.4.11)
If you have a custom login screen, then you'll want to compare it against the
stock/default one. There were some minor changes to better support the Login
Token.
I think you may be spot on by thinking there is a new hidden field.
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 6:39 PM, Tim McLaughlin
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Another possibility: is the login form different? (new hidden field
requirements, etc.) We haven't changed the form from 3.4.8, either --
we're using a locally-developed template that we've used since moving to
CAS 3, maybe with some mods when we moved from 3.2 to the 3.4 series.
Tim
On 2012/02/22 2:10 PM, "Marvin Addison"
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> Are there any big things I should be looking at in my configuration that
>> may have changed between 3.4.8 and 3.4.9+?
>
>Nothing big, but there were some minor changes that might be relevant.
>
>> I can include my deployerConfigContext.xml if needed.
>
>Please post that and any relevant log entries from the CAS application
>log file.
>
>M
--
You are currently subscribed to
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> as:
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see
http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user
--
You are currently subscribed to
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> as:
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see
http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user
--
You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as:
[email protected]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see
http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user
