No issues with removing but we should see what the protocol spec says :-) On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 2:33 AM, Jérôme LELEU <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 to remove as well > > Jérôme LELEU > Founder of CAS in the cloud: www.casinthecloud.com | Twitter: @leleuj > Chairman of CAS: www.jasig.org/cas | Creator of pac4j: www.pac4j.org > > 2014-09-19 23:39 GMT+02:00 Misagh Moayyed <[email protected]>: > >> +1 to remove. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Marvin Addison [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Friday, September 19, 2014 12:02 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [cas-user] This is embarassing >> >> > Can anyone give me one good reason to keep that check box? >> >> I'm pretty sure you've given us a good executive summary for removing it. >> :) >> >> In any case, while your experience sounds particularly bad, we've had some >> headaches supporting extended flows while maintaining proper function of >> the >> warn feature. Ticket expiration like you noted is the main concern. It's >> probably best to simply remove it; nobody here uses it either. Arguably >> nobody _any_where. >> >> M >> >> -- >> You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: >> [email protected] To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, >> see >> http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user >> >> -- >> You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: >> [email protected] >> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see >> http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user >> > > -- > You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: > [email protected] > To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see > http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user > > -- You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: [email protected] To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user
