Hi, Andrew, It sounds like you and Jason have really fleshed out this idea! Thanks!
On May 23, 2008, at 0:48 , Andrew Martens wrote:
* The scripts would need to be updated to *not* back-populate the parameters at the end so that the call is not over-written with the actual values so as to prevent too-large parameters being written into the mask.
Perhaps it would be better/easier to make back_populate smarter about whether to back-populate a field based on the string length it is about to back-populate.
Dave
