> Might make for a useful tutorial session? It's actually really easy to run
> lots of ROACH boards on a network.

I think this would be great.  I'll put it in the program somewhere!

John

>
> Of the people attending from SKA-SA, I don't think any of us are planning
> to talk about this in our main presentations. But I'd be happy to give a
> little demonstration on the side for those who'd like to hear about "ROACH
> best practices". A good venue for this might be the tutorial room where we
> can get our hands dirty.
>
> The only documentation that I know about is here:
> https://casper.berkeley.edu/wiki/Getting_Started_with_ROACH
> which links to
> https://casper.berkeley.edu/wiki/ROACH_NFS_guide
> for NFS config.
>
> Once your server's setup, you can add additional ROACH boards very easily
> by changing just one setting on each board to select network booting (from
> the factory default which is to boot off the SD card).
>
> Jason
>
>
>
> On 19 Jun 2012, at 15:39, Gary, Dale wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> We are working on a correlator design for a 16-antenna, dual pol system
>> based on eight ROACH-2 boards.  I am confident we can make the digital
>> hardware work, but the network setup, boot process, and control of these
>> 8 boards is a total mystery to me.  I wonder if someone could give a
>> summary talk at the GB CASPER workshop that covers these issues (even if
>> it is no more than pointing out where to find the up-to-date
>> documentation).  That would certainly be helpful to me, and perhaps many
>> others.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Dale
>>
>> ________________________________
>> From: [email protected]
>> [[email protected]] On Behalf Of John Ford
>> [[email protected]]
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2012 7:11 AM
>> To: Jason Manley
>> Cc: Casper Lists
>> Subject: Re: [casper] resolv.conf setup in the ROACH filesystem
>>
>>> I'm not sure this is a bug. Each user will need to configure
>>> /etc/network/interfaces, /etc/resolv.conf, /etc/hostname etc according
>>> to
>>> their specific network configurations. Most people with larger systems
>>> run
>>> an NFS root filesystem along with DHCP, so this gets configured
>>> automatically on each board by their host server.
>>
>> Yes, but the following lines seem to throw a DNS wrench into the works.
>>
>>>
>>>> search sensysnetworks.net
>>>> nameserver 192.168.1.1
>>>
>>> Is not the shipping default. Did your DHCP server hand this out by
>>> chance?
>>> AFAICT, sensysnetworks.net doesn't exist, so I'm not sure how this
>>> happened!
>>
>> I'm almost certain this is the default from the etch filesystem I
>> downloaded a couple of years ago.  We haven't updated this in quite a
>> while.  I just wanted to point this out to anyone who had weird ssh and
>> authentication problems.
>>
>> I'm glad it's already fixed in the released filesystems.
>>
>>>
>>> IIRC, the shipping default is something like hostname roach with eth0
>>> not
>>> configured.
>> We boot with NFS, which configures the eth0.
>>
>> BTW, is there a solution for the DHCP client not renewing its lease when
>> eth0 is configured during boot time?
>>
>> John
>>
>>>
>>> Jason
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 18 Jun 2012, at 23:20, Dan Werthimer wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> jason, mark,
>>>>
>>>> john asked if we could fix this in github.
>>>> who should do this?
>>>>
>>>> dan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: John Ford <[email protected]>
>>>> Date: Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 2:08 PM
>>>> Subject: [casper] resolv.conf setup in the ROACH filesystem
>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi all.  In our Roach file systems, we have the following
>>>> resolve.conf:
>>>>
>>>> Yes, Master<1019> more resolv.conf
>>>> search sensysnetworks.net
>>>> nameserver 192.168.1.1
>>>>
>>>> This isn't really a Good Thing.  It causes slowdowns and general
>>>> lossage
>>>> in the DNS system, since there's no 192.168.1.1 on our networks.
>>>>
>>>> We found that replacing the above with:
>>>>
>>>> Yes, Master<1002> more etch/etc/resolv.conf
>>>> # Empty for NFS Roach config
>>>>
>>>> Yes, Master<1003>
>>>>
>>>> This fixes the problems with ssh delays.
>>>>
>>>> John
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>



Reply via email to