hi larry,

i think if you are sending emails to [email protected]
from an email address that is different from your subscription
email address, your email will be rejected by the list server.

best wishes,

dan

On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Tom Kuiper <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 08/28/2012 01:30 PM, Larry D'Addario wrote:
>
>> I noticed your thread on this subject on the CASPER list.  (Although I
>> subscribe to the list, I'm unable to post to it for some reason that I have
>> not yet figured out.)
>>
> That's strange.  An e-mail to Mark Wagner may resolve that.  Hopefully
> he'll see this.
>
>> I have used both the pseudo-files under /proc and the katcp server to
>> communicate with registers in the FPGA, and both work fine.  I think the
>> best approach depends a lot on whether you are wanting to change the
>> low-level things interactively by typing commands, or whether you want to
>> do it from within a program.  I have done both.
>>
> I tend to begin using the interactive Python (ipython) command line.  Then
> as things are worked out I copy the commands into a Python program in an
> editor.  Even as I'm building the program I try things out or debug errors
> using the ipython command line.  Sometimes the command line is just plain
> handy.  For example, except that I was really busy, I should have done this
> when I got your e-mail about CRAFT yesterday:
>
> In [1]: from Ephem import *
> In [2]: p = Pulsar('J0332+5434')
> In [3]: p.period
> Out[3]: 714.51969972580105
>
> and you might want to do this:
>
> In [4]: d = DSS(13)
> In [5]: p.compute(d)
> In [6]: print(p.a_ra, p.a_dec)
> (3:32:59.39, 54:34:43.4)
> In [7]: print(p.ra, p.dec)
> (3:33:59.59, 54:37:04.5)
>
> Mind you, this is Python enhanced with my own modules but you get the idea.
>
>> For something that's fairly complicated, the CASPER people tend to write
>> Python programs which work via the katcp server on the PPC.  The same thing
>> can be done in C; you don't need Python unless you want to re-use some
>> existing code, but so far I've found the existing code too complex,
>> convoluted, and undocumented to make it worth the bother.
>>
> I agree.  I tried to find out how they actually write to registers and I
> dug through layer after layer only to get to some 'request' method that I
> could not locate.  By the way, there is some documentation I generated
> automatically and put on
> http://dsnra.jpl.nasa.gov/**software/Python/python-**modules/corr/<http://dsnra.jpl.nasa.gov/software/Python/python-modules/corr/>
> At the moment you can only get at it from within JPL because we closed
> outside access, pending an investigation,  after the website was hacked a
> few days ago.
>
>> If you can do your control via katcp commands, then you can put a list of
>> them in a file and execute the file like a script using my katcp
>> interpreter.
>>
> To do that I need to run katcp on the ROACH host which is behind a
> firewall (JPL's for now, FlightOps in the future).  It can be done but is
> clumsy.  Glenn's solution is more elegant.  Mine is primitive but has the
> advantage of not depending on software (corr) someone else wrote.
>
>>  To minimize network traffic, the file with the commands could be on the
>> local host rather than on a remote machine; then the only thing that goes
>> over the network is the file name.  I also have a small program that allows
>> you to run individual katcp commands but is far more user-friendly than
>> trying to type those commands directly to the server over a telnet
>> connection.
>>
> That's a front end to katcpComm, I guess.  I'm not sure how I could grow
> from that into a complex interactive graphical program, except very
> painfully using the Motif library or something like that.  There is a good
> reason for languages like Python and Matlab.
>
> I have the feeling that the file length going to zero on a simple write is
> unintended and been lurking in the borph code since no one ever tried such
> a simple OS-level write.  I'm guessing that the file pointer, which is
> reset to zero before the write, is not advanced after the write.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Tom
>
>

Reply via email to