Henno,

Thanks for the quick reply!  I just thought of this, tried it, and it
failed :)  which is good news!

--Laura

On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Henno Kriel <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Laura
>
> Number 2 seems the likely scenario. You could test this by muxing the 2
> channels to a single 10GbE to verify this (and use a register to select the
> active channel of the mux). If it still fails, 2 holds true.
>
> Regards
> Henno
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Laura Vertatschitsch 
> <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> Hey Casper,
>>
>> I compiled a design for the ROACH board using the 11.x toolset and saw
>> the resource usage for DSP48Es was "366 out of 640, 57%."
>>
>> There are many filters in the design, but can be thought of as having two
>> identical signal paths.  I built each signal path up into 64 bit words
>> ready to transmit.  One signal path I transmit off the 10 gbe port, the
>> other i simply terminated.
>>
>> Since the compile worked and seemed to not push too many resources to the
>> limit, I decided to add a second 10 gbe port to the design for the second
>> signal path.  now, my design does not fit with the error of "Too many comps
>> of type DSP48E."
>>
>> 1) Could it be that the 10 gbe port and its registers really use a lot of
>> DSP48Es?
>>
>> 2) Is it possible that since in the first design the second signal path
>> was eventually terminated, Xilinx just never built it at all and the
>> resource usage was misleading?
>>
>> 3) After the resource usage is printed to the screen, could there be
>> anything else that gets added that takes up logic or DSP48Es?
>>
>> 4) Any other advice about understanding and utilizing the resource usage
>> stats?
>>
>> --Laura
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Henno Kriel
>
> DSP Engineer
> Digital Back End
> meerKAT
>
> SKA South Africa
> Third Floor
> The Park
> Park Road (off Alexandra Road)
> Pinelands
> 7405
> Western Cape
> South Africa
>
> Latitude: -33.94329 (South); Longitude: 18.48945 (East).
>
> (p) +27 (0)21 506 7300
> (p) +27 (0)21 506 7365 (direct)
> (f) +27 (0)21 506 7375
> (m) +27 (0)84 504 5050

Reply via email to