Hi

The corruption depends on the input signal and seems to include ringing and
a higher than expected noise floor. We hope to make progress on locating
the cause today.

Regards
Andrew

On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 5:46 AM, Mugundhan vijayaraghavan <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Hello Amit, Andrew,
>
> Can you elaborate what was the error in the PFB Generic block ? Was there
> ringing ? because I had found ringing in the channel outputs recently when
> using multi-channel PFB block (see an earlier conv. opened under "PFB
> Ringing".
>
> Thank you,
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 1:39 AM, <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Send casper mailing list submissions to
>>         [email protected]
>>
>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>>
>> https://calmail.berkeley.edu/manage/list/listinfo/[email protected]
>>
>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>>         [email protected]
>>
>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>>         [email protected]
>>
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>> than "Re: Contents of casper digest..."
>>
>>
>> Today's Topics:
>>
>>    1. Re: Weird FFT Output (Amit Bansod)
>>    2. Re: Weird FFT Output (Andrew Martens)
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 10:18:19 +0100
>> From: Amit Bansod <[email protected]>
>> Subject: Re: [casper] Weird FFT Output
>> To: Jack Hickish <[email protected]>,       casper list
>>         <[email protected]>
>> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>>
>> Hi Jack,
>>
>> I finally got hold of this issue.
>>
>> The problem was in the pfb_fir_generic block. After replacing it, the
>> fft output was as expected.
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Amit
>>
>> On 06-Nov-15 5:04 PM, Jack Hickish wrote:
>> > Hi Amit,
>> >
>> > I've hastily fixed that error regarding bram latency -- it's pushed to
>> > the master casper branch at
>> https://github.com/casper-astro/mlib_devel.git
>> >
>> > You should be able to cherry pick that commit into your repository, but
>> > I recommend just using the casper-astro master branch rather than the
>> > SMA branch you're currently working with. The SMA code was merged into
>> > casper-astro more recently than the commit you are currently at anyway.
>> >
>> > As for your spectra, I'd suggest seeing if the problem persists with the
>> > latest casper-astro master branch and then investigating further from
>> there.
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> > Jack
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, 6 Nov 2015 at 11:14 Amit Bansod <[email protected]
>> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> >
>> >     Dear All,
>> >
>> >     I am trying to extract 1 channel/band using PFB/FFT
>> (pfb_fir_generic &
>> >     fft_wideband_real blocks from casper library) and I am getting
>> >     inconsistent result from a 64 channel PFB/FFT.
>> >
>> >     I also found that the for 64 channel FFT, the fft_wideband_real
>> block
>> >     breaks at
>> fft_wideband_real/fft_biplex_real_4x/bi_real_unscr_4x/delay0
>> >     (or ../bi_real_unscr_4x/delay1) for BRAM latency > 2. Can this be
>> also a
>> >     cause for concern ?
>> >
>> >     I have enclosed the plots of the same band for the 64 & 128 channel
>> >     FFTs. The BW of 1 band is 12.5 MHz for 128 channels and 25 MHz for
>> 64
>> >     channels FFT.
>> >
>> >     The design has ASIAA 5g ADCs with fpga running at 200 MHz and same
>> noise
>> >     source is feeding both ADCs.
>> >
>> >     I am using the sma-wideband repository with commit : ecab6f5
>> >
>> >
>> >     Regards,
>> >     Amit Bansod
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 2
>> Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 16:17:04 +0200
>> From: Andrew Martens <[email protected]>
>> Subject: Re: [casper] Weird FFT Output
>> To: Amit Bansod <[email protected]>
>> Cc: casper list <[email protected]>
>> Message-ID:
>>         <
>> cadewhtdzbzdmesoqbgp39vxjhyov508j0epw-yhxwl3g8s0...@mail.gmail.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>
>> Hi Amit
>>
>> We have also identified a bug in the pfb_fir_generic block and are working
>> on debugging it. Will let you know when we have a solution. Sorry for the
>> inconvenience.
>>
>> Regards
>> Andrew
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Amit Bansod <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi Jack,
>> >
>> > I finally got hold of this issue.
>> >
>> > The problem was in the pfb_fir_generic block. After replacing it, the
>> > fft output was as expected.
>> >
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> > Amit
>> >
>> > On 06-Nov-15 5:04 PM, Jack Hickish wrote:
>> > > Hi Amit,
>> > >
>> > > I've hastily fixed that error regarding bram latency -- it's pushed to
>> > > the master casper branch at
>> > https://github.com/casper-astro/mlib_devel.git
>> > >
>> > > You should be able to cherry pick that commit into your repository,
>> but
>> > > I recommend just using the casper-astro master branch rather than the
>> > > SMA branch you're currently working with. The SMA code was merged into
>> > > casper-astro more recently than the commit you are currently at
>> anyway.
>> > >
>> > > As for your spectra, I'd suggest seeing if the problem persists with
>> the
>> > > latest casper-astro master branch and then investigating further from
>> > there.
>> > >
>> > > Cheers,
>> > > Jack
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Fri, 6 Nov 2015 at 11:14 Amit Bansod <[email protected]
>> > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > >     Dear All,
>> > >
>> > >     I am trying to extract 1 channel/band using PFB/FFT
>> (pfb_fir_generic
>> > &
>> > >     fft_wideband_real blocks from casper library) and I am getting
>> > >     inconsistent result from a 64 channel PFB/FFT.
>> > >
>> > >     I also found that the for 64 channel FFT, the fft_wideband_real
>> block
>> > >     breaks at
>> > fft_wideband_real/fft_biplex_real_4x/bi_real_unscr_4x/delay0
>> > >     (or ../bi_real_unscr_4x/delay1) for BRAM latency > 2. Can this be
>> > also a
>> > >     cause for concern ?
>> > >
>> > >     I have enclosed the plots of the same band for the 64 & 128
>> channel
>> > >     FFTs. The BW of 1 band is 12.5 MHz for 128 channels and 25 MHz
>> for 64
>> > >     channels FFT.
>> > >
>> > >     The design has ASIAA 5g ADCs with fpga running at 200 MHz and same
>> > noise
>> > >     source is feeding both ADCs.
>> > >
>> > >     I am using the sma-wideband repository with commit : ecab6f5
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >     Regards,
>> > >     Amit Bansod
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> An HTML attachment scrubbed and removed.
>> HTML attachments are only available in MIME digests.
>>
>> End of casper Digest, Vol 98, Issue 13
>> **************************************
>>
>
>
>
> --
> the giver of moksha
>

Reply via email to