Are you running the latest version of the toolflow? Earlier versions did not 
include the CPU interface to the DRAM.

Jason


On 02 Dec 2016, at 15:30, Franco <francocuro...@gmail.com> wrote:

> The register is not present in the bitstream. I thought that the register was 
> inside the dram yellow block though. I have to add it manually or something?
> 
> Here is the listdev just in case:
> 
> ['acc_len',
> 'adc5g_controller',
> 'cnt_rst',
> 'dout0_0',
> 'dout0_1',
> 'dout0_2',
> 'dout0_3',
> 'dout1_0',
> 'dout1_1',
> 'dout1_2',
> 'dout1_3',
> 'dout2_0',
> 'dout2_1',
> 'dout2_2',
> 'dout2_3',
> 'filter_gain',
> 'filter_on',
> 'snapshot0_bram',
> 'snapshot0_ctrl',
> 'snapshot0_status',
> 'snapshot0_trig_offset',
> 'snapshot1_bram',
> 'snapshot1_ctrl',
> 'snapshot1_status',
> 'snapshot1_trig_offset',
> 'sync_gen_sync',
> 'sync_gen_sync_period_sel',
> 'sync_gen_sync_period_var',
> 'sys_board_id',
> 'sys_clkcounter',
> 'sys_rev',
> 'sys_rev_rcs',
> 'sys_scratchpad',
> 'write_done']
> 
> thanks,
> 
> Franco
> 
> 
> On 02/12/16 10:02, Marc Welz wrote:
>> Then there is no bitstream programmed or the particular bitstream
>> doesn't contain that register. Type
>> 
>> ?listdev
>> 
>> on that connection to find out
>> 
>> regards
>> 
>> marc
>> 
>> 
>> On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Franco <francocuro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> It says: #log error 1018802834854 raw
>>> register\_dram_controller\_not\_defined
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Franco
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 02/12/16 04:32, Marc Welz wrote:
>>>> telnet to the roach on port 7147 while repeating the operation - what
>>>> do the #log messages say ?
>>>> 
>>>> On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 3:43 PM, Franco <francocuro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Hi!
>>>>> 
>>>>> I tried to test the dram of ROACH2 by porting an example model I had for
>>>>> ROACH1.
>>>>> 
>>>>> However when I tried to read the dram I got the following error:
>>>>> 
>>>>> RuntimeError: Request write failed.
>>>>>    Request: ?write dram_controller 0 \0\0\0\0
>>>>>    Reply: !write fail.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Someone knows what's the problem?
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> thanks,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Franco Curotto
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
> 
> 


Reply via email to