Hi Karl,

On Thu, 15 Mar 2018 at 21:59 Karl Warnick <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I have a non-astronomical comms antenna array project that does not have
> detailed specs for bandwidth and number of antenna elements. I need to
> build a programmable platform that I can use for multichannel sampling
> and real time DSP.
>
> Our group has considerable experience with ROACH based systems over the
> years and hybrid FPGA - GPU architectures, but the students with much of
> the expertise have graduated and moved on, as students tend to do. We
> have an x64 board and ROACH that on paper could do the job, but the
> hardware seems old enough now that I wonder if it might be wise to move
> to a new platform for my new project. We also like the easier
> programmability of GPUs for matrix based array signal processing
> algorithms. We also have a system with digitizers, polyphase filterbanks
> running on ROACH boards, ethernet switch, and HPCs with GPUs, but that
> system is in operation at GBO and is probably overkill for the current
> project.
>
> This leads to my question. To realize a system with 16 analog channels
> and analog bandwidth ranging between a few MHz up to 100 MHz (I realize
> that this is a rather ill defined range, but I feel fortunate to have
> the flexibility), that can do digitization, filterbank to separate into
> frequency channels, and enough processor power for real time XB
> (correlator/beamformer) type signal processing, with current CASPER
> hardware, what would be the ideal, recommended hardware setup?
>

I think your options here are either a/some SNAP board(s) -- 12 ADC
channels at up to 250 MSample/s sampling rate, or a ROACH2 + adc16 card --
16 channels at up to 250MSample/s. Either would give you Ethernet output on
SFP+ connectors. SNAP can do up to 20Gb/s output, ROACH2 up to 80Gb/s.
In either case, there should be some simulink designs you could use as a
starting point, from PAPER/HERA or other projects.

Cheers
Jack


>
> The relatively modest bandwidth requirement may also point to a
> commercial FPGA/ARM core board with an ADC expansion board, and I'm
> pursuing that path as well. From another project, I have an expansion
> board of our own design with eight ADC channels that plugs into a
> microZED board, which actually comes somewhat close to meeting the
> current requirements. Expanding the ADC board and moving to a bigger
> commercial digital board is an option.
>
> Thanks to all for any feedback!
>
> Best,
> Karl
>
> --
> Karl F. Warnick
> Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering
> Brigham Young University
> 459 Clyde Building
> Provo, UT 84602
> (801) 422-1732
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "
> [email protected]" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"[email protected]" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].

Reply via email to