Hello Brent,
That was it! Thanks for that! Good catch, I'm using a recent Ubuntu version
whereas my previous installs are all really old & stable systems that I
haven't had to touch or mess with in a long time.

Thanks again,
LD

On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 12:42 PM Brent Graner <bgra...@uw.edu> wrote:

> Hi Louis-
>
> I'm only familiar with the ROACH2, but one of the more insidious problems
> we had setting ours up on a new ubuntu 16.04 machine was that the ROACH2
> expects the outdated NFS version 2, which was disabled by default (and
> re-enabled in /proc/fs/nfsd/versions). I’m not sure what the default
> behavior is on the ROACH1 with your OS, but if it's an NFS problem and a
> new-ish Unix OS machine it may be worth checking.
>
> best of luck,
> Brent Graner
> University of Washington
>
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 10:21 AM Louis P. Dartez <louisdar...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>> I'm setting up an NFS server for a ROACH-1 board. I've done this a couple
>> of times before but this time there's an issue I've never encountered. The
>> ROACH board is assigned the correct ip address (dhcp is working) and seems
>> to load the uImage just fine. However, when it attempts to mount the root
>> directory it suddenly fails and the kernel panics (see attached minicom
>> output). My issue is very similar to this post from 2015
>> <https://casper.berkeley.narkive.com/5CLtX8BR/roach1-not-working> except
>> I'm not getting a useful NFS error. I don't have another machine on this
>> subnet that I can use to test the NFS mounting from, but I am able to mount
>> that directory using 'sudo mount 192.168.4.12:/srv/roach_boot_etch /mnt'
>> from the same host (I'm not sure if this undermines NFS and just remounts
>> the target).
>> Has anyone else seen something like this before? My ethernet connect is
>> 100Mbps, my exports match what's in the dnsmasq configuration file, I've
>> made sure to restart all services (nfs-kernel-server, dnsmasq, etc.) after
>> all changes, and permissions for the boot/etch directories not restricted
>> (currently all is 777, but there is no change when using 755). In fact, as
>> far as I can tell, my current configuration is identical to others that I
>> have working. I've included the contents of my dnsmasq config, dnsmasq log,
>> the output of rpcinfo -p, exportfs -rva, and showmount -e to this message
>> as well. Any suggests for what to try next at this point would be greatly
>> appreciated!
>>
>> Best,
>> LD
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "casper@lists.berkeley.edu" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to casper+unsubscr...@lists.berkeley.edu.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/a/lists.berkeley.edu/d/msgid/casper/CALQjEoW7%3Dv%2BDcruFFx9CPuhVmbMORwv7%3DENhTRFmbPbcAJT72w%40mail.gmail.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/a/lists.berkeley.edu/d/msgid/casper/CALQjEoW7%3Dv%2BDcruFFx9CPuhVmbMORwv7%3DENhTRFmbPbcAJT72w%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"casper@lists.berkeley.edu" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to casper+unsubscr...@lists.berkeley.edu.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/lists.berkeley.edu/d/msgid/casper/CALQjEoXswGvztw-%3DNM8YsTEyg7wKRh23YNNHVmKN-Dou4eS8xw%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to